TY - JOUR
T1 - An overview of existing algorithms for resolving the 180° ambiguity in vector magnetic fields
T2 - Quantitative tests with synthetic data
AU - Metcalf, Thomas R.
AU - Leka, K. D.
AU - Barnes, Graham
AU - Lites, Bruce W.
AU - Georgoulis, Manolis K.
AU - Pevtsov, A. A.
AU - Balasubramaniam, K. S.
AU - Gary, G. Allen
AU - Jing, Ju
AU - Li, Jing
AU - Liu, Y.
AU - Wang, H. N.
AU - Abramenko, Valentyna
AU - Yurchyshyn, Vasyl
AU - Moon, Y. J.
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank Y. Fan for providing one of the datasets used to compare the ambiguity resolution algorithms, and Louise Beierle for her efforts in making the workshop a success. The National Center for Atmospheric Research is sponsored by the National Science Foundation. The National Solar Observatory is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc (AURA) for the National Science Foundation. Logistical support for this research was provided by the Helio-seismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) project through NASA Grant NAS5-02139. Logistical support was also provided by the NCAR Strategic Initiative Community Spectro-polarimetric Analysis Center (CSAC). TRM, KDL, and GB acknowledge funding from NASA/LWS under contract NNH05CC49C.
PY - 2006/9
Y1 - 2006/9
N2 - We report here on the present state-of-the-art in algorithms used for resolving the 180° ambiguity in solar vector magnetic field measurements. With present observations and techniques, some assumption must be made about the solar magnetic field in order to resolve this ambiguity. Our focus is the application of numerous existing algorithms to test data for which the correct answer is known. In this context, we compare the algorithms quantitatively and seek to understand where each succeeds, where it fails, and why. We have considered five basic approaches: comparing the observed field to a reference field or direction, minimizing the vertical gradient of the magnetic pressure, minimizing the vertical current density, minimizing some approximation to the total current density, and minimizing some approximation to the field's divergence. Of the automated methods requiring no human intervention, those which minimize the square of the vertical current density in conjunction with an approximation for the vanishing divergence of the magnetic field show the most promise.
AB - We report here on the present state-of-the-art in algorithms used for resolving the 180° ambiguity in solar vector magnetic field measurements. With present observations and techniques, some assumption must be made about the solar magnetic field in order to resolve this ambiguity. Our focus is the application of numerous existing algorithms to test data for which the correct answer is known. In this context, we compare the algorithms quantitatively and seek to understand where each succeeds, where it fails, and why. We have considered five basic approaches: comparing the observed field to a reference field or direction, minimizing the vertical gradient of the magnetic pressure, minimizing the vertical current density, minimizing some approximation to the total current density, and minimizing some approximation to the field's divergence. Of the automated methods requiring no human intervention, those which minimize the square of the vertical current density in conjunction with an approximation for the vanishing divergence of the magnetic field show the most promise.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33748794217&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33748794217&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11207-006-0170-x
DO - 10.1007/s11207-006-0170-x
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:33748794217
SN - 0038-0938
VL - 237
SP - 267
EP - 296
JO - Solar Physics
JF - Solar Physics
IS - 2
ER -