TY - GEN
T1 - Behavioral Heterogeneity Enhances Self-assembly
T2 - 17th International Symposium on Distributed Autonomous Robotic Systems, DARS 2024
AU - Swissler, Petras
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2026.
PY - 2026
Y1 - 2026
N2 - This paper explores variants of ReactiveBuild, an algorithm that enables 3D, free-form, and environment-adaptive robot self-assembly. The most successful variant introduces a population of “arrogant” agents that ignore low-priority recruitment signals. This variant improved the simulated self-assembly of structures while also reducing the number of steps required for robots to create these structures. These results suggest that swarm heterogeneity can enhance the performance of self-assembly algorithms. Additionally, the paper discusses several variants that did not meaningfully improve algorithm performance but nonetheless provide interesting and useful lessons for robot self-assembly researchers. These variants were the introduction of hysteresis, varying the sensitivity of robots to force measurements with time, randomly moving in an incorrect direction, and probabilistic stopping. The limited impact to algorithm performance indicates that the ReactiveBuild algorithm is robust against robot hardware issues such as force sensor errors, environmental perception issues, and inconsistent communications, suggesting that the algorithm is well-suited to deployment on real robot hardware.
AB - This paper explores variants of ReactiveBuild, an algorithm that enables 3D, free-form, and environment-adaptive robot self-assembly. The most successful variant introduces a population of “arrogant” agents that ignore low-priority recruitment signals. This variant improved the simulated self-assembly of structures while also reducing the number of steps required for robots to create these structures. These results suggest that swarm heterogeneity can enhance the performance of self-assembly algorithms. Additionally, the paper discusses several variants that did not meaningfully improve algorithm performance but nonetheless provide interesting and useful lessons for robot self-assembly researchers. These variants were the introduction of hysteresis, varying the sensitivity of robots to force measurements with time, randomly moving in an incorrect direction, and probabilistic stopping. The limited impact to algorithm performance indicates that the ReactiveBuild algorithm is robust against robot hardware issues such as force sensor errors, environmental perception issues, and inconsistent communications, suggesting that the algorithm is well-suited to deployment on real robot hardware.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105021985358
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105021985358#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-032-04584-3_8
DO - 10.1007/978-3-032-04584-3_8
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:105021985358
SN - 9783032045836
T3 - Springer Proceedings in Advanced Robotics
SP - 100
EP - 114
BT - Distributed Autonomous Robotic Systems - 17th International Symposium
A2 - Nilles, Alexandra
A2 - Petersen, Kirstin H.
A2 - Lam, Tin Lun
A2 - Prorok, Amanda
A2 - Rubenstein, Michael
A2 - Otte, Michael
PB - Springer Nature
Y2 - 28 October 2024 through 30 October 2024
ER -