TY - JOUR
T1 - Churning, power laws, and inequality in a spatial agent-based model of social networks
AU - Cho, Jae Beum
AU - Mansury, Yuri S.
AU - Ye, Xinyue
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016, The Author(s).
PY - 2016/11/1
Y1 - 2016/11/1
N2 - Amidst many previous network models lacking a spatial dimension, this paper proposes a dynamic agent-based model of social network formation that explicitly considers space. We find that varying the dynamics of agent interaction causes the emergence of differential degree distributions as well as nonlinear dynamics in social and spatial inequalities. The scale-free property of degree connectivity vanishes when tie formation dominates tie dissolution, with power laws re-emerging when tie dissolution is of equal strength or stronger than tie formation. Furthermore, we find a nonlinear relationship between network density and agent inequality in social resources. In particular, multiple phase transitions occur where the relationship is positive in one phase but negative in another. This suggests that, contrary to intuition, higher connectivity can have an adverse distributional impact by benefiting the already privileged. Critically, we find a tradeoff between agent inequality and spatial inequality where the geographic concentration of social resources accompanies a more equal distribution of connectivity. Finally, the disadvantage of agents with limited spatial reach is exacerbated as network density increases. Our results thus highlight the importance of distinguishing between social and spatial inequality in policymaking.
AB - Amidst many previous network models lacking a spatial dimension, this paper proposes a dynamic agent-based model of social network formation that explicitly considers space. We find that varying the dynamics of agent interaction causes the emergence of differential degree distributions as well as nonlinear dynamics in social and spatial inequalities. The scale-free property of degree connectivity vanishes when tie formation dominates tie dissolution, with power laws re-emerging when tie dissolution is of equal strength or stronger than tie formation. Furthermore, we find a nonlinear relationship between network density and agent inequality in social resources. In particular, multiple phase transitions occur where the relationship is positive in one phase but negative in another. This suggests that, contrary to intuition, higher connectivity can have an adverse distributional impact by benefiting the already privileged. Critically, we find a tradeoff between agent inequality and spatial inequality where the geographic concentration of social resources accompanies a more equal distribution of connectivity. Finally, the disadvantage of agents with limited spatial reach is exacerbated as network density increases. Our results thus highlight the importance of distinguishing between social and spatial inequality in policymaking.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84990848139&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84990848139&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00168-016-0791-4
DO - 10.1007/s00168-016-0791-4
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84990848139
SN - 0570-1864
VL - 57
SP - 275
EP - 307
JO - Annals of Regional Science
JF - Annals of Regional Science
IS - 2-3
ER -