Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Clinical utility and prospective of TMS–EEG: Updated review from an international expert group

  • Ulf Ziemann
  • , Yang Bai
  • , Fiona M. Baumer
  • , Mikkel M. Beck
  • , Paolo Belardinelli
  • , Daniele Belvisi
  • , Stephan Bender
  • , Til Ole Bergmann
  • , Marta Bortoletto
  • , Silvia Casarotto
  • , Elias Casula
  • , Arthur R. Chaves
  • , Daniel Ciampi de Andrade
  • , Antonella Conte
  • , Zafiris J. Daskalakis
  • , Faranak Farzan
  • , Fabio Ferrarelli
  • , Paul B. Fitzgerald
  • , Pedro C. Gordon
  • , Christian Grefkes
  • Sylvain Harquel, Julio C. Hernandez-Pavon, Aron T. Hill, Kate E. Hoy, Friedhelm C. Hummel, Petro Julkunen, Elisa Kallioniemi, Corey J. Keller, Vasilios K. Kimiskidis, Melissa Kirkovski, Giacomo Koch, Giorgio Leodori, Pantelis Lioumis, Sara Määttä, Inbal Maidan, Marcello Massimini, Annerose Mengel, Johanna Metsomaa, Carlo Miniussi, Tuomas P. Mutanen, Yoshihiro Noda, Recep A. Ozdemir, Estelle Raffin, Lorenzo Rocchi, Nigel C. Rogasch, Mario Rosanova, Emiliano Santarnecchi, Simone Sarasso, Siobhan M. Schabrun, Mouhsin M. Shafi, Hartwig R. Siebner, Else A. Tolner, Leo Tomasevic, Sara Tremblay, Caroline Tscherpel, Domenica Veniero, Viviana Versace, Daphne Voineskos, Steve Vucic, Abraham Zangen, Christoph Zrenner, Risto J. Ilmoniemi

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive technique to stimulate the brain, while electroencephalography (EEG) is a non-invasive technique to record its electrical activity. Their combined use (TMS–EEG) has been established only relatively recently, after successful development of TMS-compatible EEG amplifiers. TMS-EEG offers the unparalleled opportunity to directly perturb the brain with TMS and simultaneously record its response with EEG. This allows inferences on causal input–output relationships, therefore going critically beyond purely observational techniques, such as resting-state EEG or functional MRI, in the study of brain dynamics. This consensus review updates the work of Tremblay and coworkers [Clin Neurophysiol 2019; 130: 802–844]. Since then, substantial advances have been made in understanding contamination of TMS–EEG signals by physiological and non-physiological artifacts, as well as in developing strategies to avoid or control them. In parallel, new insights have emerged regarding the physiological mechanisms underlying TMS-EEG responses and their diagnostic and prognostic utility in a broad range of psychiatric and neurological disorders. As such, TMS-EEG is rapidly shaping a dynamic new field in clinical neurophysiology and neuroscience. This review provides a critical and comprehensive synthesis of current knowledge, including practical guidance for implementing TMS-EEG in the clinical setting.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number2111487
JournalClinical Neurophysiology
Volume184
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2026

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sensory Systems
  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Physiology (medical)

Keywords

  • Cortical excitability
  • Effective connectivity
  • Electroencephalography
  • TMS-EEG
  • Transcranial magnetic stimulation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Clinical utility and prospective of TMS–EEG: Updated review from an international expert group'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this