TY - JOUR
T1 - Comodulation masking release in speech identification with real and simulated cochlear-implant hearing
AU - Ihlefeld, Antje
AU - Shinn-Cunningham, Barbara G.
AU - Carlyon, Robert P.
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was funded by the Medical Research Council. We would like to thank all listeners for participating in this research project. Dr. John Deeks helped with cochlear implant testing. Two reviewers provided valuable feedback on an earlier version of this manuscript. 1
PY - 2012/2
Y1 - 2012/2
N2 - For normal-hearing (NH) listeners, masker energy outside the spectral region of a target signal can improve target detection and identification, a phenomenon referred to as comodulation masking release (CMR). This study examined whether, for cochlear implant (CI) listeners and for NH listeners presented with a noise vocoded CI simulation, speech identification in modulated noise is improved by a co-modulated flanking band. In Experiment 1, NH listeners identified noise-vocoded speech in a background of on-target noise with or without a flanking narrow band of noise outside the spectral region of the target. The on-target noise and flanker were either 16-Hz square-wave modulated with the same phase or were unmodulated; the speech was taken from a closed-set corpus. Performance was better in modulated than in unmodulated noise, and this difference was slightly greater when the comodulated flanker was present, consistent with a small CMR of about 1.7 dB for noise-vocoded speech. Experiment 2, which tested CI listeners using the same speech materials, found no advantage for modulated versus unmodulated maskers and no CMR. Thus although NH listeners can benefit from CMR even for speech signals with reduced spectro-temporal detail, no CMR was observed for CI users.
AB - For normal-hearing (NH) listeners, masker energy outside the spectral region of a target signal can improve target detection and identification, a phenomenon referred to as comodulation masking release (CMR). This study examined whether, for cochlear implant (CI) listeners and for NH listeners presented with a noise vocoded CI simulation, speech identification in modulated noise is improved by a co-modulated flanking band. In Experiment 1, NH listeners identified noise-vocoded speech in a background of on-target noise with or without a flanking narrow band of noise outside the spectral region of the target. The on-target noise and flanker were either 16-Hz square-wave modulated with the same phase or were unmodulated; the speech was taken from a closed-set corpus. Performance was better in modulated than in unmodulated noise, and this difference was slightly greater when the comodulated flanker was present, consistent with a small CMR of about 1.7 dB for noise-vocoded speech. Experiment 2, which tested CI listeners using the same speech materials, found no advantage for modulated versus unmodulated maskers and no CMR. Thus although NH listeners can benefit from CMR even for speech signals with reduced spectro-temporal detail, no CMR was observed for CI users.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84857410915&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84857410915&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1121/1.3676701
DO - 10.1121/1.3676701
M3 - Article
C2 - 22352505
AN - SCOPUS:84857410915
SN - 0001-4966
VL - 131
SP - 1315
EP - 1324
JO - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
JF - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
IS - 2
ER -