TY - JOUR
T1 - CONCUSS randomised clinical trial of vergence/accommodative therapy for concussion-related symptomatic convergence insufficiency
AU - CONCUSS Investigator Group
AU - Alvarez, Tara L.
AU - Scheiman, Mitchell
AU - Hajebrahimi, Farzin
AU - Noble, Melissa
AU - Gohel, Suril
AU - Baro, Rebecca
AU - Bachman, Josie A.
AU - Master, Christina L.
AU - Goodman, Arlene
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2025. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ Group.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Objective: The CONCUSS randomised clinical trial compared the effectiveness of immediate office-based vergence/accommodative therapy with movement (OBVAM) to delayed therapy for the treatment of concussion-related convergence insufficiency (CONC-CI) in participants 11-25 years old with persisting postconcussive symptoms 4-24 weeks post injury. Methods: Symptomatic CONC-CI was diagnosed using clinical signs via near point of convergence (NPC) and positive fusional vergence (PFV) and symptoms via the Convergence Insufficiency Symptom Survey (CISS). Participants were randomised to immediate OBVAM (twice weekly for 6 weeks) or delayed OBVAM (starting 6 weeks after baseline enrolment). After 6 weeks (outcome time 1 assessment), the therapeutic outcomes of NPC, PFV and CISS were assessed and compared between the two groups. After the outcome time 1 assessment, the delayed group received twice-weekly OBVAM sessions for 8 weeks, while the immediate group received an additional 2 weeks of twice-weekly OBVAM sessions. The outcome time 2 assessment compared groups after each group received all 16 OBVAM sessions. Results: In the immediate group, 46/52 (88%) were classified as successful or improved at the outcome time one assessment based on the primary outcome measure, a composite of NPC and PFV, compared with 4/52 (8%) in the delayed group (p<0.001). The mean NPC decreased (improved) by 7.9 cm in the immediate group and 1.8 cm in the delayed group (mean difference at outcome time 1 assessment: 5.1 cm (95% CI: 3.9 to 6.3; p<0.001)). The mean PFV increased (improved) by 17.5Δ in the immediate group and 2.5 in the delayed group (mean difference at outcome time 1 assessment: 15.0Δ (95% CI:11.7 to 18.3); p<0.001). At the outcome time 1 assessment, 41/52 (79%) of the participants in the immediate group had improved symptoms based on CISS scores ≤ preinjury scores or decreased by 10 points or more, compared with only 7/52 (13%) of participants from the delayed group (p<0.001). When comparing dosing in the immediate group, for 12 OBVAM sessions, 88% were classified as successful or improved using the composite measurement of NPC and PFV, which increased to 94% after 16 OBVAM sessions. For the outcome time 2 assessment, when both groups had received 16 OBVAM sessions, no significant difference was observed for NPC, PFV or CISS (p=1.0). Conclusion: OBVAM therapy is effective in improving the NPC, PFV and symptoms in CONC-CI. Immediate initiation of OBVAM compared with delayed initiation shortens the period of symptoms experienced and fosters an earlier return to activities. Trial registration number: clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT05262361.
AB - Objective: The CONCUSS randomised clinical trial compared the effectiveness of immediate office-based vergence/accommodative therapy with movement (OBVAM) to delayed therapy for the treatment of concussion-related convergence insufficiency (CONC-CI) in participants 11-25 years old with persisting postconcussive symptoms 4-24 weeks post injury. Methods: Symptomatic CONC-CI was diagnosed using clinical signs via near point of convergence (NPC) and positive fusional vergence (PFV) and symptoms via the Convergence Insufficiency Symptom Survey (CISS). Participants were randomised to immediate OBVAM (twice weekly for 6 weeks) or delayed OBVAM (starting 6 weeks after baseline enrolment). After 6 weeks (outcome time 1 assessment), the therapeutic outcomes of NPC, PFV and CISS were assessed and compared between the two groups. After the outcome time 1 assessment, the delayed group received twice-weekly OBVAM sessions for 8 weeks, while the immediate group received an additional 2 weeks of twice-weekly OBVAM sessions. The outcome time 2 assessment compared groups after each group received all 16 OBVAM sessions. Results: In the immediate group, 46/52 (88%) were classified as successful or improved at the outcome time one assessment based on the primary outcome measure, a composite of NPC and PFV, compared with 4/52 (8%) in the delayed group (p<0.001). The mean NPC decreased (improved) by 7.9 cm in the immediate group and 1.8 cm in the delayed group (mean difference at outcome time 1 assessment: 5.1 cm (95% CI: 3.9 to 6.3; p<0.001)). The mean PFV increased (improved) by 17.5Δ in the immediate group and 2.5 in the delayed group (mean difference at outcome time 1 assessment: 15.0Δ (95% CI:11.7 to 18.3); p<0.001). At the outcome time 1 assessment, 41/52 (79%) of the participants in the immediate group had improved symptoms based on CISS scores ≤ preinjury scores or decreased by 10 points or more, compared with only 7/52 (13%) of participants from the delayed group (p<0.001). When comparing dosing in the immediate group, for 12 OBVAM sessions, 88% were classified as successful or improved using the composite measurement of NPC and PFV, which increased to 94% after 16 OBVAM sessions. For the outcome time 2 assessment, when both groups had received 16 OBVAM sessions, no significant difference was observed for NPC, PFV or CISS (p=1.0). Conclusion: OBVAM therapy is effective in improving the NPC, PFV and symptoms in CONC-CI. Immediate initiation of OBVAM compared with delayed initiation shortens the period of symptoms experienced and fosters an earlier return to activities. Trial registration number: clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT05262361.
KW - Brain Concussion
KW - Physical Therapy Specialty
KW - Vision, Ocular
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105018524362
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=105018524362&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/bjsports-2025-109807
DO - 10.1136/bjsports-2025-109807
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105018524362
SN - 0306-3674
JO - British Journal of Sports Medicine
JF - British Journal of Sports Medicine
M1 - bjsports-2025-109807
ER -