Effects of four modes of group communication on the outcomes of software requirements determination

Rosalie Ocker, Jerry Fjermestad, Starr Roxanne Hiltz, Kenneth Johnson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

97 Scopus citations


Research on computer-mediated communication and group support systems has focused on the study of a single mode of communication technology in comparison to unsupported face-to-face (FtF) groups. However, as organizations combine traditional FtF meetings with a variety of anytime/anyplace communication technologies to support collaborative work, the need to study these new forms of interaction grows greater. This experiment builds on prior work by comparing the effectiveness of four modes of communication for groups working on the upstream phases of software development: (1) face-to-face, (2) synchronous computer conferencing, (3) asynchronous computer conferencing, and (4) combined FtF and asynchronous computer conferencing. Teams of graduate students determined the requirements for an automated post office as a course assignment over a period of two weeks. The creativity and quality of solutions produced by groups in the combined condition were higher than those in the remaining three communication mod es. Combined groups were generally more satisfied with their solutions, although no differences among conditions were found regarding satisfaction with the process used to accomplish work.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)99-118
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Management Information Systems
Issue number1
StatePublished - 1998

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Management Information Systems
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Management Science and Operations Research
  • Information Systems and Management


  • Computer conferencing
  • Computer-mediated communication
  • Creativity
  • Group support systems
  • Requirements analysis


Dive into the research topics of 'Effects of four modes of group communication on the outcomes of software requirements determination'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this