TY - JOUR
T1 - End-To-End Resource Analysis for Quantum Interior-Point Methods and Portfolio Optimization
AU - Dalzell, Alexander M.
AU - Clader, B. David
AU - Salton, Grant
AU - Berta, Mario
AU - Lin, Cedric Yen Yu
AU - Bader, David A.
AU - Stamatopoulos, Nikitas
AU - Schuetz, Martin J.A.
AU - Brandão, Fernando G.S.L.
AU - Katzgraber, Helmut G.
AU - Zeng, William J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 authors. Published by the American Physical Society. Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - We study quantum interior-point methods (QIPMs) for second-order cone programming (SOCP), guided by the example use case of portfolio optimization (PO). We provide a complete quantum circuit-level description of the algorithm from problem input to problem output, making several improvements to the implementation of the QIPM. We report the number of logical qubits and the quantity and/or depth of non-Clifford T gates needed to run the algorithm, including constant factors. The resource counts we find depend on instance-specific parameters, such as the condition number of certain linear systems within the problem. To determine the size of these parameters, we perform numerical simulations of small PO instances, which lead to concrete resource estimates for the PO use case. Our numerical results do not probe large enough instance sizes to make conclusive statements about the asymptotic scaling of the algorithm. However, already at small instance sizes, our analysis suggests that, due primarily to large constant prefactors, poorly conditioned linear systems, and a fundamental reliance on costly quantum state tomography, fundamental improvements to the QIPM are required for it to lead to practical quantum advantage.
AB - We study quantum interior-point methods (QIPMs) for second-order cone programming (SOCP), guided by the example use case of portfolio optimization (PO). We provide a complete quantum circuit-level description of the algorithm from problem input to problem output, making several improvements to the implementation of the QIPM. We report the number of logical qubits and the quantity and/or depth of non-Clifford T gates needed to run the algorithm, including constant factors. The resource counts we find depend on instance-specific parameters, such as the condition number of certain linear systems within the problem. To determine the size of these parameters, we perform numerical simulations of small PO instances, which lead to concrete resource estimates for the PO use case. Our numerical results do not probe large enough instance sizes to make conclusive statements about the asymptotic scaling of the algorithm. However, already at small instance sizes, our analysis suggests that, due primarily to large constant prefactors, poorly conditioned linear systems, and a fundamental reliance on costly quantum state tomography, fundamental improvements to the QIPM are required for it to lead to practical quantum advantage.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85178079871&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85178079871&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1103/PRXQuantum.4.040325
DO - 10.1103/PRXQuantum.4.040325
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85178079871
SN - 2691-3399
VL - 4
JO - PRX Quantum
JF - PRX Quantum
IS - 4
M1 - 040325
ER -