TY - GEN
T1 - Energy performance of an occupancy-based climate control (OBCC) technology in guest rooms
AU - Kim, Hyojin
AU - Oldham, Emily
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
©2019 ASHRAE
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - This paper presents the results of a detailed energy savings analysis ofthe use ofoccupancy-based climate control (OBCC) technology in guestrooms using a calibrated building energy simulation based on one year ofdetailed energy, indoor environment quality (IEQ), and occupancy measurements of 14 guest rooms in the case-study hotel building in Washington, DC. A calibrated building energy simulation was selected to normalize the key variables affecting the performance of the OBCC technology (i.e., weather, indoor temperatures, and occupancy effects), which were not properly adjusted in previously reported savings. As a result, the simulated energy savings of the OBCC control algorithm installed in the case-study hotel rooms are about 29.4% of the heating and cooling energy use (i.e., $2.27/m2 [$0.21/ft2]) with a 6.5% increase in the hours the loads were not met during occupied hours. The analysis also shows lower savings were calculated for smaller temperature setback/setup ranges.
AB - This paper presents the results of a detailed energy savings analysis ofthe use ofoccupancy-based climate control (OBCC) technology in guestrooms using a calibrated building energy simulation based on one year ofdetailed energy, indoor environment quality (IEQ), and occupancy measurements of 14 guest rooms in the case-study hotel building in Washington, DC. A calibrated building energy simulation was selected to normalize the key variables affecting the performance of the OBCC technology (i.e., weather, indoor temperatures, and occupancy effects), which were not properly adjusted in previously reported savings. As a result, the simulated energy savings of the OBCC control algorithm installed in the case-study hotel rooms are about 29.4% of the heating and cooling energy use (i.e., $2.27/m2 [$0.21/ft2]) with a 6.5% increase in the hours the loads were not met during occupied hours. The analysis also shows lower savings were calculated for smaller temperature setback/setup ranges.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071905357&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85071905357&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85071905357
T3 - ASHRAE Transactions
SP - 703
EP - 717
BT - ASHRAE Transactions - 2019 ASHRAE Winter Conference
PB - ASHRAE
T2 - 2019 ASHRAE Winter Conference
Y2 - 12 January 2019 through 16 January 2019
ER -