TY - GEN
T1 - Experimental Investigation of CO2-Brine Simultaneous and Alternate Injection
T2 - 58th US Rock Mechanics / Geomechanics Symposium 2024, ARMA 2024
AU - Eyitayo, S.
AU - Watson, M.
AU - Ispas, I.
AU - Kolawole, O.
AU - Moronkeji, D.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright 2024 ARMA, American Rock Mechanics Association.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - To enhance carbon management, the study investigates water-alternating gas (WAG) injection for carbon dioxide (CO2) sequestration in saline aquifers, focusing on its impact on storage capacity.Utilizing core flooding experiments with Gray Berea sandstone and Indiana Limestones at 2500psia confining pressure and CO2 injection at 1100 psi and 100°F to maintain CO2 in a supercritical state, the research compared Continuous CO2 Injection (CCI) and Simultaneous or Alternate Injection of CO2 and Brine (SAI).Findings indicate that CCI and SAI are more favorable regarding increasing storage capacity with SAI, showing a 7.8% porosity increase in sandstone and 11.3% in limestone.However, there is a higher increase in permeability in the case of CCI, which could lead to a higher risk of leakages.SAI demonstrated lower overpressure, suggesting more CO2 can be stored relative to CCI, efficient plume management and enhanced fluid displacement through residual and mineral trapping.This study shows SAI's potential in CO2 sequestration projects, offering insights into brine-assisted strategies for improved storage capacities.
AB - To enhance carbon management, the study investigates water-alternating gas (WAG) injection for carbon dioxide (CO2) sequestration in saline aquifers, focusing on its impact on storage capacity.Utilizing core flooding experiments with Gray Berea sandstone and Indiana Limestones at 2500psia confining pressure and CO2 injection at 1100 psi and 100°F to maintain CO2 in a supercritical state, the research compared Continuous CO2 Injection (CCI) and Simultaneous or Alternate Injection of CO2 and Brine (SAI).Findings indicate that CCI and SAI are more favorable regarding increasing storage capacity with SAI, showing a 7.8% porosity increase in sandstone and 11.3% in limestone.However, there is a higher increase in permeability in the case of CCI, which could lead to a higher risk of leakages.SAI demonstrated lower overpressure, suggesting more CO2 can be stored relative to CCI, efficient plume management and enhanced fluid displacement through residual and mineral trapping.This study shows SAI's potential in CO2 sequestration projects, offering insights into brine-assisted strategies for improved storage capacities.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85213061361&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85213061361&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.56952/ARMA-2024-0593
DO - 10.56952/ARMA-2024-0593
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85213061361
T3 - 58th US Rock Mechanics / Geomechanics Symposium 2024, ARMA 2024
BT - 58th US Rock Mechanics / Geomechanics Symposium 2024, ARMA 2024
PB - American Rock Mechanics Association (ARMA)
Y2 - 23 June 2024 through 26 June 2024
ER -