Extending import detection algorithms for concept import from two to three biomedical terminologies

Vipina K. Keloth, James Geller, Yan Chen, Julia Xu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations


Background: While enrichment of terminologies can be achieved in different ways, filling gaps in the IS-A hierarchy backbone of a terminology appears especially promising. To avoid difficult manual inspection, we started a research program in 2014, investigating terminology densities, where the comparison of terminologies leads to the algorithmic discovery of potentially missing concepts in a target terminology. While candidate concepts have to be approved for import by an expert, the human effort is greatly reduced by algorithmic generation of candidates. In previous studies, a single source terminology was used with one target terminology. Methods: In this paper, we are extending the algorithmic detection of “candidate concepts for import” from one source terminology to two source terminologies used in tandem. We show that the combination of two source terminologies relative to one target terminology leads to the discovery of candidate concepts for import that could not be found with the same “reliability” when comparing one source terminology alone to the target terminology. We investigate which triples of UMLS terminologies can be gainfully used for the described purpose and how many candidate concepts can be found for each individual triple of terminologies. Results: The analysis revealed a specific configuration of concepts, overlapping two source and one target terminology, for which we coined the name “fire ladder” pattern. The three terminologies in this pattern are tied together by a kind of “transitivity.” We provide a quantitative analysis of the discovered fire ladder patterns and we report on the inter-rater agreement concerning the decision of importing candidate concepts from source terminologies into the target terminology. We algorithmically identified 55 instances of the fire ladder pattern and two domain experts agreed on import for 39 instances. In total, 48 concepts were approved by at least one expert. In addition, 105 import candidate concepts from a single source terminology into the target terminology were also detected, as a “beneficial side-effect” of this method, increasing the cardinality of the result. Conclusion: We showed that pairs of biomedical source terminologies can be transitively chained to suggest possible imports of concepts into a target terminology.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number272
JournalBMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
StatePublished - Dec 2020

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Health Policy
  • Health Informatics
  • Computer Science Applications


  • Concept import
  • Density differences
  • National cancer institute thesaurus
  • Terminologies
  • UMLS


Dive into the research topics of 'Extending import detection algorithms for concept import from two to three biomedical terminologies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this