Further adventures in the case against restoration

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

29 Scopus citations

Abstract

Ecological restoration has been a topic for philosophical criticism for three decades. In this essay, I present a discussion of the arguments against ecological restoration and the objections raised against my position. I have two purposes in mind: (1) to defend my views against my critics, and (2) to demonstrate that the debate over restoration reveals fundamental ideas about the meaning of nature, ideas that are necessary for the existence of any substantive environmentalism. I discuss the possibility of positive restorations, the idea that nature can restore itself, the meaning of artifacts, and the significance of the distinction between humanity and nature.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)67-97
Number of pages31
JournalEnvironmental Ethics
Volume34
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2012

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
  • Philosophy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Further adventures in the case against restoration'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this