Abstract
A comparison is made of the performances of two detection strategies that are based on different data fusion techniques. The strategies detect changes in a linear system. One detection strategy involves combining the estimates and error covariance matrices of distributed Kalman filters, generating a residual from the used estimates, comparing this residual to a threshold, and making a decision. The other detection strategy involves a distributed decision process in which estimates from distributed Kalman filters are used to generate distributed residuals which are compared locally to a threshold. Local decisions are made and these decisions are then fused into a global decision. The performances of each of these detection schemes are compared, and it is concluded that better performance is achieved when local decisions are made and then fused into a global decision.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Proceedings of the American Control Conference |
Editors | Anon |
Publisher | Publ by American Automatic Control Council |
Pages | 2296-2298 |
Number of pages | 3 |
Volume | 3 |
ISBN (Print) | 0879425652 |
State | Published - Dec 1 1991 |
Externally published | Yes |
Event | Proceedings of the 1991 American Control Conference - Boston, MA, USA Duration: Jun 26 1991 → Jun 28 1991 |
Other
Other | Proceedings of the 1991 American Control Conference |
---|---|
City | Boston, MA, USA |
Period | 6/26/91 → 6/28/91 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Control and Systems Engineering