TY - GEN
T1 - Heuristic optimization in design
AU - Ashour, Yassin
AU - Kolarevic, Branko
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 ACADIA. All rights reserved.
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - This paper presents a workflow called the ‘heuristic optimization workflow’ that integrates Octopus, a Multi-Objective Optimization (MOO) engine with Grasshopper3D, a parametric modeling tool, and multiple simulation software. It describes a process that enables the designer to integrate disparate domains via Octopus and complete a feedback loop with the developed interactive, real-time visualization tools. A retrospective design of the Bow Tower in Calgary is used as a test case to study the impact of the developed workflow and tools, as well as the impact of MOO on the performance of the solutions. Seven optimization runs over two different parametric iterations were conducted with the aim of increasing the Floor Area Ratio (FAR) and thus financial profit, average daylight factor, views score, and decreasing the shaded area and the glare produced by the building. The overall workflow makes MOO-based results more accessible to designers and encourages a more interactive ‘heuristic’ exploration of various geometric and topological trajectories. The workflow also reduces design decision uncertainty, design cycle latency through the incorporation of a feedback loop between geometric models and their associated quantitative data and the exploration of trade-offs of multiple solutions all within one platform.
AB - This paper presents a workflow called the ‘heuristic optimization workflow’ that integrates Octopus, a Multi-Objective Optimization (MOO) engine with Grasshopper3D, a parametric modeling tool, and multiple simulation software. It describes a process that enables the designer to integrate disparate domains via Octopus and complete a feedback loop with the developed interactive, real-time visualization tools. A retrospective design of the Bow Tower in Calgary is used as a test case to study the impact of the developed workflow and tools, as well as the impact of MOO on the performance of the solutions. Seven optimization runs over two different parametric iterations were conducted with the aim of increasing the Floor Area Ratio (FAR) and thus financial profit, average daylight factor, views score, and decreasing the shaded area and the glare produced by the building. The overall workflow makes MOO-based results more accessible to designers and encourages a more interactive ‘heuristic’ exploration of various geometric and topological trajectories. The workflow also reduces design decision uncertainty, design cycle latency through the incorporation of a feedback loop between geometric models and their associated quantitative data and the exploration of trade-offs of multiple solutions all within one platform.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051957313&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85051957313&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85051957313
T3 - ACADIA 2015 - Computational Ecologies: Design in the Anthropocene: Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture
BT - ACADIA 2015 - Computational Ecologies
A2 - Perry, Chris
A2 - Combs, Lonn
PB - ACADIA
T2 - 35th Annual Conference of the Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture - Computational Ecologies: Design in the Anthropocene, ACADIA 2015
Y2 - 19 October 2015 through 25 October 2015
ER -