Information content, audit reports and going-concern: An Australian study

Max Bessell, Asokan Anandarajan, Ahson Umar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

26 Scopus citations


Research conducted on the information content of going concern 'modified' reports in the USA and UK indicates that a modified audit report does not appear to have information content to users if the going concern contingency is disclosed in the notes to the financial statements. In the present study, we provide evidence from Australia. We examine whether modification/qualification by an auditor in Australia (an 'Emphasis of Matter' and an 'Except for' report, respectively) has information content to a user. The results indicate that for a company in a state of financial distress, the modification, in either form, does not appear to significantly enhance either perceptions of risk or decision-making.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)261-282
Number of pages22
JournalAccounting and Finance
Issue number3
StatePublished - Nov 2003

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Accounting
  • Finance
  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)


  • Audit reports
  • Financial distress
  • Going concern


Dive into the research topics of 'Information content, audit reports and going-concern: An Australian study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this