TY - GEN
T1 - Integrated versus isolated training of the hemiparetic upper extremity in haptically rendered virtual environments
AU - Qiu, Qinyin
AU - Fluet, Gerard G.
AU - Saleh, Soha
AU - Lafond, Ian
AU - Merians, Alma S.
AU - Adamovich, Sergei V.
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - This paper describes the preliminary results of an ongoing study of the effects of two training approaches on motor function and learning in persons with hemi paresis due to cerebrovascular accidents. Eighteen subjects with chronic stroke performed eight, three-hour sessions of sensorimotor training in haptically renedered environments. Eleven subjects performed training activities that integrated hand and arm movement while another seven subjects performed activities that trained the hand and arm with separately. As a whole, the eighteen subjects made statistically significant improvements in motor function as evidenced by robust improvements in Wolf Motor Function Test times and corresponding improvements in Jebsen Test of Hand Function times. There were no significant between group effects for these tests. However, the two training approaches elicited different patterns and magnitudes of performance improvement that suggest that they may elicit different types of change in motor learning and or control.
AB - This paper describes the preliminary results of an ongoing study of the effects of two training approaches on motor function and learning in persons with hemi paresis due to cerebrovascular accidents. Eighteen subjects with chronic stroke performed eight, three-hour sessions of sensorimotor training in haptically renedered environments. Eleven subjects performed training activities that integrated hand and arm movement while another seven subjects performed activities that trained the hand and arm with separately. As a whole, the eighteen subjects made statistically significant improvements in motor function as evidenced by robust improvements in Wolf Motor Function Test times and corresponding improvements in Jebsen Test of Hand Function times. There were no significant between group effects for these tests. However, the two training approaches elicited different patterns and magnitudes of performance improvement that suggest that they may elicit different types of change in motor learning and or control.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78650842996&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78650842996&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/IEMBS.2010.5627631
DO - 10.1109/IEMBS.2010.5627631
M3 - Conference contribution
C2 - 21097011
AN - SCOPUS:78650842996
SN - 9781424441235
T3 - 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC'10
SP - 2255
EP - 2258
BT - 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC'10
T2 - 2010 32nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC'10
Y2 - 31 August 2010 through 4 September 2010
ER -