Measuring consensus and conflict among stakeholders in emergency response information system requirements negotiations

Catherine Campbell, Fadi Deek, Murray Turoff, Bartel Van De Walle

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

This paper introduces the experimental design we developed for the analysis of asynchronous negotiations among five different stakeholders as they work towards consensus on the functional system requirements that are needed for a common emergency response information system. We present three analytical preference models to measure the evolving consensus and conflict among the stakeholders as they modify their preferences during the negotiation. We illustrate the use of these techniques for obtaining a detailed understanding of the negotiation dynamics among the stakeholders.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationProceedings of ISCRAM 2004 - 1st International Workshop on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management
PublisherRoyal Flemish Academy of Belgium
Pages121-126
Number of pages6
ISBN (Print)9076971080, 9789076971087
StatePublished - Jan 1 2004
Event1st International Workshop on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management, ISCRAM 2004 - Brussels, Belgium
Duration: May 3 2004May 4 2004

Publication series

NameProceedings of ISCRAM 2004 - 1st International Workshop on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management

Other

Other1st International Workshop on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management, ISCRAM 2004
CountryBelgium
CityBrussels
Period5/3/045/4/04

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Information Systems

Keywords

  • Analytical preference models
  • Asynchronous negotiations
  • Emergency response information systems
  • Software requirements
  • Stakeholder preferences

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Measuring consensus and conflict among stakeholders in emergency response information system requirements negotiations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this