TY - JOUR
T1 - Mixing and characterization of nanosized powders
T2 - An assessment of different techniques
AU - Wei, Dongguang
AU - Dave, Rajesh
AU - Pfeffer, Robert
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank the US Army, Picatinny Arsenal for financial support through contract # DAAE30-98-C-1050, the National Science Foundation for financial support through grant # CTS-9985618, and the New Jersey Commission of Science and Technology for financial support through contract # 01-2042-007-24. The authors are also grateful to Prof. M. Libera of Stevens Institute of Technology for his assistance in using TEM and EELS and the many valuable discussions with him to help interpret the results obtained. Thanks are also due to Dr. James Bentley of Oak Ridge National Laboratory and the staff of LEO, USA for their help with the energy-filtered imaging results. Dr. Bentley’s research at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, SHaRE Collaborative Research Center was sponsored by the Division of Materials Sciences and Engineering, US Department of Energy, under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725 with UT-Battelle, LLC, and through the SHaRE Program under contract DE-AC05-76OR00033 with Oak Ridge Associated Universities.
PY - 2002
Y1 - 2002
N2 - The objective of this paper was to gain an understanding of the mixing and characterization of nanosized powders. Three different nanosized material systems were selected based on their physical and chemical properties. Mixing experiments of the selected nanopowders were performed using a variety of environmentally friendly dry powder processing devices and the rapid expansion of supercritical CO2 suspensions (RESS process) and compared with solvent-based methods coupled with ultrasonic agitation. A number of imaging techniques, including FESEM, AFM, TEM, EELS and EDS were used to characterize the degree of mixing or homogeneity of the mixtures obtained. The results indicate that only some of the imaging techniques are capable of determining the quality of nanoparticle mixing, depending on the physical and chemical properties of the nanopowders. For example, field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) is suitable for characterizing powder mixtures having a distinct difference in particle shape, or with a large difference in atomic number of the metallic element of the two constituents. Only electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) was able to fully characterize nanopowder mixtures of SiO2 and TiO2 at the nanoscale. Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) provided information on mixing quality, but only on a scale of about 1 μm. The results also show that solvent-based mixing methods coupled with ultrasonic agitation, and RESS generally perform better than dry powder processing systems, with the exception of the hybridizer, in generating a homogeneous mixture.
AB - The objective of this paper was to gain an understanding of the mixing and characterization of nanosized powders. Three different nanosized material systems were selected based on their physical and chemical properties. Mixing experiments of the selected nanopowders were performed using a variety of environmentally friendly dry powder processing devices and the rapid expansion of supercritical CO2 suspensions (RESS process) and compared with solvent-based methods coupled with ultrasonic agitation. A number of imaging techniques, including FESEM, AFM, TEM, EELS and EDS were used to characterize the degree of mixing or homogeneity of the mixtures obtained. The results indicate that only some of the imaging techniques are capable of determining the quality of nanoparticle mixing, depending on the physical and chemical properties of the nanopowders. For example, field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) is suitable for characterizing powder mixtures having a distinct difference in particle shape, or with a large difference in atomic number of the metallic element of the two constituents. Only electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) was able to fully characterize nanopowder mixtures of SiO2 and TiO2 at the nanoscale. Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) provided information on mixing quality, but only on a scale of about 1 μm. The results also show that solvent-based mixing methods coupled with ultrasonic agitation, and RESS generally perform better than dry powder processing systems, with the exception of the hybridizer, in generating a homogeneous mixture.
KW - Characterization
KW - Dry particle processing
KW - Mixing
KW - Nanoparticles
KW - RESS
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036375657&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036375657&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1023/A:1020184524538
DO - 10.1023/A:1020184524538
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0036375657
SN - 1388-0764
VL - 4
SP - 21
EP - 41
JO - Journal of Nanoparticle Research
JF - Journal of Nanoparticle Research
IS - 1-2
ER -