TY - JOUR
T1 - On adaptive procedures controlling the familywise error rate
AU - Sarkar, Sanat K.
AU - Guo, Wenge
AU - Finner, Helmut
N1 - Funding Information:
The research of the first author is supported by the NSF Grants DMS-0603868 and DMS-1006344 and the research of the second author is supported by the NSF Grant DMS-1006021 . We sincerely thank two referees for giving helpful and insightful comments which have led to an improved presentation of the paper.
PY - 2012/1
Y1 - 2012/1
N2 - The idea of modifying, and potentially improving, classical multiple testing methods controlling the familywise error rate (FWER) via an estimate of the unknown number of true null hypotheses has been around for a long time without a formal answer to the question whether or not such adaptive methods ultimately maintain the strong control of FWER, until Finner and Gontscharuk (2009) and Guo (2009) have offered some answers. A class of adaptive Bonferroni and Šidàk methods larger than considered in those papers is introduced, with the FWER control now proved under a weaker distributional setup. Numerical results show that there are versions of adaptive Bonferroni and Šidàk methods that can perform better under certain positive dependence situations than those previously considered. A different adaptive Holm method and its stepup analog, referred to as an adaptive Hochberg method, are also introduced, and their FWER control is proved asymptotically, as in those papers. These adaptive Holm and Hochberg methods are numerically seen to often outperform the previously considered adaptive Holm method.
AB - The idea of modifying, and potentially improving, classical multiple testing methods controlling the familywise error rate (FWER) via an estimate of the unknown number of true null hypotheses has been around for a long time without a formal answer to the question whether or not such adaptive methods ultimately maintain the strong control of FWER, until Finner and Gontscharuk (2009) and Guo (2009) have offered some answers. A class of adaptive Bonferroni and Šidàk methods larger than considered in those papers is introduced, with the FWER control now proved under a weaker distributional setup. Numerical results show that there are versions of adaptive Bonferroni and Šidàk methods that can perform better under certain positive dependence situations than those previously considered. A different adaptive Holm method and its stepup analog, referred to as an adaptive Hochberg method, are also introduced, and their FWER control is proved asymptotically, as in those papers. These adaptive Holm and Hochberg methods are numerically seen to often outperform the previously considered adaptive Holm method.
KW - Adaptive methods
KW - Familywise error rate
KW - Multiple testing
KW - Stepdown method
KW - Stepup method
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80052274709&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80052274709&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jspi.2011.06.022
DO - 10.1016/j.jspi.2011.06.022
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:80052274709
SN - 0378-3758
VL - 142
SP - 65
EP - 78
JO - Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference
JF - Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference
IS - 1
ER -