TY - GEN
T1 - On the optimal block length for joint channel and network coding
AU - Koller, Christian
AU - Haenggi, Martin
AU - Kliewer, Jörg
AU - Costello, Daniel J.
PY - 2011
Y1 - 2011
N2 - Channel coding alone is not sufficient to reliably transmit a message of finite length from a source to one or more destinations. To ensure that no data is lost, channel coding on the physical layer needs to be combined with rateless erasure correcting schemes such as automatic repeat request (ARQ) or random linear network coding (RLNC) on a higher layer. In this paper we consider channel coding on a binary symmetric channel and random linear network coding for erasure correction. Given a message of length K and network coding over a finite Galois field of size q, we obtain the optimal number of blocks for network coding that minimizes the expected number of transmissions. We consider both a single link and broadcast to n destinations. As the field size of network coding gets large and the expected coding overhead in blocks becomes small, we show that, given our assumptions, the benefit of using a larger channel coded block outweighs the advantage of employing network coding over many blocks and the optimal number of number of blocks tends to one, making RLNC equivalent to simple ARQ.
AB - Channel coding alone is not sufficient to reliably transmit a message of finite length from a source to one or more destinations. To ensure that no data is lost, channel coding on the physical layer needs to be combined with rateless erasure correcting schemes such as automatic repeat request (ARQ) or random linear network coding (RLNC) on a higher layer. In this paper we consider channel coding on a binary symmetric channel and random linear network coding for erasure correction. Given a message of length K and network coding over a finite Galois field of size q, we obtain the optimal number of blocks for network coding that minimizes the expected number of transmissions. We consider both a single link and broadcast to n destinations. As the field size of network coding gets large and the expected coding overhead in blocks becomes small, we show that, given our assumptions, the benefit of using a larger channel coded block outweighs the advantage of employing network coding over many blocks and the optimal number of number of blocks tends to one, making RLNC equivalent to simple ARQ.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=83655191094&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=83655191094&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/ITW.2011.6089518
DO - 10.1109/ITW.2011.6089518
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:83655191094
SN - 9781457704376
T3 - 2011 IEEE Information Theory Workshop, ITW 2011
SP - 528
EP - 532
BT - 2011 IEEE Information Theory Workshop, ITW 2011
T2 - 2011 IEEE Information Theory Workshop, ITW 2011
Y2 - 16 October 2011 through 20 October 2011
ER -