Paradigm and pluralism: Using theory from occupational sociology and the sociology of the professions to frame an identity for IS

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Concern that high levels of pluralism within IS have frustrated the development of a strong identity are evident in the literature. Rather than proposing an identity for IS, this paper uses theory and research from occupational sociology and the sociology of professions to analyze the processes involved in establishing boundaries for the field, for defining errors of inclusion and exclusion, and for shaping an IS identity. It is argued that prior work misapplies an organizational metaphor to IS and this misspecification excludes important processes in the evolution of professions including level of paradigm development, culture and control within professions, and the role of professions in social status hierarchies. The paper concludes with a discussion of the challenges facing IS and suggestions for addressing them.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publication14th Americas Conference on Information Systems, AMCIS 2008
Pages2216-2223
Number of pages8
StatePublished - 2008
Event14th Americas Conference on Information Systems, AMCIS 2008 - Toronto, ON, Canada
Duration: Aug 14 2008Aug 17 2008

Publication series

Name14th Americas Conference on Information Systems, AMCIS 2008
Volume4

Other

Other14th Americas Conference on Information Systems, AMCIS 2008
Country/TerritoryCanada
CityToronto, ON
Period8/14/088/17/08

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Computer Science Applications
  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Library and Information Sciences
  • Information Systems

Keywords

  • IS identity
  • Occupations and professions
  • Paradigm development
  • Socialization

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Paradigm and pluralism: Using theory from occupational sociology and the sociology of the professions to frame an identity for IS'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this