TY - JOUR
T1 - Plane-Wave analysis and comparison of split-field, biaxial, and uniaxial PML methods as ABCs for pseudospectral electromagnetic wave simulations in curvilinear coordinates
AU - Yang, Baolin
AU - Petropoulos, Peter G.
N1 - Funding Information:
The first author would like to thank Professor Marcus J. Grote for his help in setting up the radiating dipole test and Professor Jan Hesthaven for helpful discussions. Both authors are grateful to David Gottlieb for his constant encouragement. The first author was supported by DARPA/AFOSR Grant F49620-96-1-0426. The second author was supported in part by AFOSR Grant F49620-98-1-0001. The U.S. Government is authorized to reproduce and distribute reprints for governmental purposes notwithstanding any copyright notation thereon. The views and conclusions contained herein are those of the author and should not be interpreted as necessarily representing the official policies or endorsements, either expressed or implied, of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, the Air Force Office of Scientific Research, or the U.S. Government.
PY - 1998/11/1
Y1 - 1998/11/1
N2 - In this paper, we discuss and compare split-field, biaxial, and uniaxial perfectly matched layer (PML) methods for absorbing outgoing vector waves in cylindrical and spherical coordinates. We first extend Berenger's split-field formulation into spherical and cylindrical coordinates in such a way that it maintains all the desirable properties it exhibits in rectangular coordinates. Then we discuss the biaxial and the uniaxial medium PML methods in Cartesian coordinates and extend them to spherical and cylindrical coordinates. Properties of plane-wave solutions of the PML methods are analyzed. In particular, the decay and boundness properties of the solutions are considered in order to provide further insight into the different formulations presented herein. Moreover, we propose a set of symmetric hyperbolic equations for both the biaxial and the uniaxial PML methods in the time-domain, which is fine-tuned in numerical experiments and very suitable for time-domain problems. All three types of spherical and cylindrical PML methods are applied in simulations of plane wave scattering as well as radiating dipole problems. We use a multidomain pseudospectral (Chebyshev) numerical scheme, and the effectiveness of the PML methods is demonstrated through the accurate numerical results obtained. The order of outer-boundary reflection is as low as 0.1% of the exact solution.
AB - In this paper, we discuss and compare split-field, biaxial, and uniaxial perfectly matched layer (PML) methods for absorbing outgoing vector waves in cylindrical and spherical coordinates. We first extend Berenger's split-field formulation into spherical and cylindrical coordinates in such a way that it maintains all the desirable properties it exhibits in rectangular coordinates. Then we discuss the biaxial and the uniaxial medium PML methods in Cartesian coordinates and extend them to spherical and cylindrical coordinates. Properties of plane-wave solutions of the PML methods are analyzed. In particular, the decay and boundness properties of the solutions are considered in order to provide further insight into the different formulations presented herein. Moreover, we propose a set of symmetric hyperbolic equations for both the biaxial and the uniaxial PML methods in the time-domain, which is fine-tuned in numerical experiments and very suitable for time-domain problems. All three types of spherical and cylindrical PML methods are applied in simulations of plane wave scattering as well as radiating dipole problems. We use a multidomain pseudospectral (Chebyshev) numerical scheme, and the effectiveness of the PML methods is demonstrated through the accurate numerical results obtained. The order of outer-boundary reflection is as low as 0.1% of the exact solution.
KW - Multidomain method
KW - Perfectly matched layer
KW - Pseudospectral method
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032209442&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032209442&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1006/jcph.1998.6082
DO - 10.1006/jcph.1998.6082
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0032209442
SN - 0021-9991
VL - 146
SP - 747
EP - 774
JO - Journal of Computational Physics
JF - Journal of Computational Physics
IS - 2
ER -