TY - JOUR
T1 - Seismic collapse assessment of archetype frames with ductile concrete beam hinges
AU - Tariq, Hasan
AU - Jampole, Ezra A.
AU - Bandelt, Matthew J.
N1 - Funding Information:
Matthew J. Bandelt reports financial support was provided by National Science Foundation. Matthew J. Bandelt reports a relationship with National Science Foundation that includes: funding grants.
Funding Information:
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 2141955. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. The authors also gratefully acknowledge support from the John A. Reif, Jr. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at New Jersey Institute of Technology.
Funding Information:
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 2141955. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. The authors also gratefully acknowledge support from the John A. Reif, Jr. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at New Jersey Institute of Technology.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author(s)
PY - 2023/3
Y1 - 2023/3
N2 - Highly ductile cement-based materials have emerged as alternatives to conventional concrete materials to improve the seismic resistance of reinforced concrete (RC) structures. While experimental and numerical research on the behavior of individual components has provided significant knowledge on element-level response, relatively little is known about how ductile cement-based materials influence system-level behavior in seismic applications. This study uses recently developed lumped-plasticity models to simulate the unique failure characteristics and ductility of reinforced ductile-cement-based materials in beam hinges and applies them in the assessment of archetype frame structures. Numerous story heights (four, eight, and twelve), frame configurations (perimeter vs. space), materials (conventional vs. ductile concrete), and replacement mechanisms within the beam hinges are considered in the seismic analysis of the archetype structures. Results and comparisons are made in terms of the probability of collapse at 2% in 50-year ground motion, mean annual frequency of collapse, and adjusted collapse margin ratio (ACMR) across archetype structures. The results show that engineered HPFRCCs in beam plastic-hinge regions can improve the seismic safety of moment frame buildings with higher collapse margin ratios, lower probability of collapse, and the ability to withstand large deformations. Data is also reported on how ductile concrete materials can reduce concrete volume and longitudinal reinforcement tonnage across frame configurations and story heights while maintaining or improving seismic resistance of the structural system. Results demonstrate future research needs to assess life-cycle costs, predict column hinge behavior, and develop code-based design methods for structural systems using highly ductile concrete materials.
AB - Highly ductile cement-based materials have emerged as alternatives to conventional concrete materials to improve the seismic resistance of reinforced concrete (RC) structures. While experimental and numerical research on the behavior of individual components has provided significant knowledge on element-level response, relatively little is known about how ductile cement-based materials influence system-level behavior in seismic applications. This study uses recently developed lumped-plasticity models to simulate the unique failure characteristics and ductility of reinforced ductile-cement-based materials in beam hinges and applies them in the assessment of archetype frame structures. Numerous story heights (four, eight, and twelve), frame configurations (perimeter vs. space), materials (conventional vs. ductile concrete), and replacement mechanisms within the beam hinges are considered in the seismic analysis of the archetype structures. Results and comparisons are made in terms of the probability of collapse at 2% in 50-year ground motion, mean annual frequency of collapse, and adjusted collapse margin ratio (ACMR) across archetype structures. The results show that engineered HPFRCCs in beam plastic-hinge regions can improve the seismic safety of moment frame buildings with higher collapse margin ratios, lower probability of collapse, and the ability to withstand large deformations. Data is also reported on how ductile concrete materials can reduce concrete volume and longitudinal reinforcement tonnage across frame configurations and story heights while maintaining or improving seismic resistance of the structural system. Results demonstrate future research needs to assess life-cycle costs, predict column hinge behavior, and develop code-based design methods for structural systems using highly ductile concrete materials.
KW - Archetype frames
KW - Collapse assessment
KW - HPFRCC Plastic-hinge
KW - Lumped-plasticity model
KW - Mean annual frequency of collapse
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85165242351&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85165242351&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.rcns.2023.02.008
DO - 10.1016/j.rcns.2023.02.008
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85165242351
SN - 2772-7416
VL - 2
SP - 103
EP - 119
JO - Resilient Cities and Structures
JF - Resilient Cities and Structures
IS - 1
ER -