Abstract
Five test strategies for memory testing are compared for their ability to detect coupled-cell faults in an n-word-by-1-b random-access memory. In all five test strategies the data-in line is randomly driven. Three of five strategies use random selection of both the address lines and the read/write control. The other two strategies sequentially cycle through the address space with deterministic setting of the read/write control. The relative merit of these five strategies is measured by the average number of accesses per address needed to meet a standard test quality level. It is concluded that ETWO (explicit memory test with word operations) offers the best performance and is quite easy to implement.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Title of host publication | 20 Int Test Conf 1989 ITC |
Editors | Anon |
Publisher | Publ by IEEE |
Pages | 439-451 |
Number of pages | 13 |
ISBN (Print) | 0818689625 |
State | Published - Dec 1 1989 |
Externally published | Yes |
Event | 20th International Test Conference 1989 (ITC) - Washington, DC, USA Duration: Aug 29 1989 → Aug 31 1989 |
Other
Other | 20th International Test Conference 1989 (ITC) |
---|---|
City | Washington, DC, USA |
Period | 8/29/89 → 8/31/89 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Engineering(all)