TY - JOUR
T1 - The impact of the JOBS act on the costs of going public
T2 - evidence from long-term audit costs
AU - Gupta, Sudip
AU - Micale, Joseph A.
AU - Robin, Ashok
AU - Yang, Rong
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - The Jumpstart Our Business Startups (JOBS) Act (2012) allows reduced compliance costs for IPOs with less than $1 billion in revenues. While prior research has focused on the Act’s ability to reduce short-term IPO compliance costs, we investigate how the Act affected key observable compliance costs–audit fees–over the five years the issuing firm is eligible for this reduced level of disclosure/compliance. In contrast to prior findings of increased short-term audit costs, we find that long-term audit costs decreased by 16.6 percent, or $172,000 for IPO firms following JOBS, relative to the change fees for in control firms unaffected by the regulation. After investigating other consequences of the Act, we find greater information uncertainty for affected firms following JOBS. However, we find lower accrual-based earnings management as responses to these information frictions. We find the reductions in earnings management is driven by firms with the greatest information uncertainty with investors, suggesting that affected firms take additional steps to mitigate the information risks in light of their inherently riskier IPOs. Overall, we present a fuller picture of the costs/benefits and risk mitigation in post-JOBS IPOs.
AB - The Jumpstart Our Business Startups (JOBS) Act (2012) allows reduced compliance costs for IPOs with less than $1 billion in revenues. While prior research has focused on the Act’s ability to reduce short-term IPO compliance costs, we investigate how the Act affected key observable compliance costs–audit fees–over the five years the issuing firm is eligible for this reduced level of disclosure/compliance. In contrast to prior findings of increased short-term audit costs, we find that long-term audit costs decreased by 16.6 percent, or $172,000 for IPO firms following JOBS, relative to the change fees for in control firms unaffected by the regulation. After investigating other consequences of the Act, we find greater information uncertainty for affected firms following JOBS. However, we find lower accrual-based earnings management as responses to these information frictions. We find the reductions in earnings management is driven by firms with the greatest information uncertainty with investors, suggesting that affected firms take additional steps to mitigate the information risks in light of their inherently riskier IPOs. Overall, we present a fuller picture of the costs/benefits and risk mitigation in post-JOBS IPOs.
KW - audit fees
KW - audit pricing
KW - EGC
KW - IPO regulation
KW - JOBS Act
KW - SOX 404(b)
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85201826565&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85201826565&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/00014788.2024.2382298
DO - 10.1080/00014788.2024.2382298
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85201826565
SN - 0001-4788
JO - Accounting and Business Research
JF - Accounting and Business Research
ER -