THE WASSERSTEIN DISTANCES BETWEEN PUSHED-FORWARD MEASURES WITH APPLICATIONS TO UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION*

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

In the study of dynamical and physical systems, the input parameters are often uncertain or randomly distributed according to a measure ϱ. The system's response f pushes forward ϱ to a new measure f * ϱ which we would like to study. However, we might not have access to f, but to its approximation g. This problem is common in the use of surrogate models for numerical uncertainty quantification (UQ). We thus arrive at a fundamental question – if f and g are close in an Lq space, does the measure g*ϱ approximate f*ϱ well, and in what sense? Previously, it was demonstrated that the answer to this question might be negative when posed in terms of the Lp distance between probability density functions (PDF). Instead, we show in this paper that the Wasserstein metric is the proper framework for this question. For domains in $$d, we bound the Wasserstein distance Wp(f*ϱ,g*ϱ) from above by $$. Furthermore, we prove lower bounds for the cases where p=1 and p=2 (for d=1) in terms of moments approximation. From a numerical analysis standpoint, since the Wasserstein distance is related to the cumulative distribution function (CDF), we show that the latter is well approximated by methods such as spline interpolation and generalized polynomial chaos (gPC).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)707-724
Number of pages18
JournalCommunications in Mathematical Sciences
Volume18
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2020
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • General Mathematics
  • Applied Mathematics

Keywords

  • Approximation
  • Density-Estimation
  • Optimal Transport
  • Uncertainty-Quantification
  • Wasserstein

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'THE WASSERSTEIN DISTANCES BETWEEN PUSHED-FORWARD MEASURES WITH APPLICATIONS TO UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION*'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this